About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the Random category from April 2008.

Random: March 2008 is the previous archive.

Random: May 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

The Counter

0 chickens
0 turkeys
0 ducks
0 pigs
0 cattle
0 sheep
0
0

Number of animals killed in the world by the meat, dairy and egg industries since you opened this webpage, not including the billions of marine animals killed annually.

Random: April 2008 Archives

I can haz bread?

A conversation last week between two very exhausted, frazzled women. One of whom is me. 

"Well, but when you can't even eat bread it's hard to live on a low budget."

"I know but - wait what? Bread?"

"Vegans can't eat bread."

"Huh?"

"Vegans can't eat bread. It all has milk and eggs in it."

"I don't know what you mean by bread, but I promise you, that substance made from flour and yeast that they bake in the oven and then use to make sandwiches with? I can eat that. It doesn't all have animal products in it."

"No you can't. Vegans can't eat bread." 

"Dude, I ate bread this morning. I am vegan."

"Whatever."


Is it any wonder people think it's a) ridiculously hard and b) extremely expensive to go vegan?  

To set the record straight, vegans can indeed eat bread. In fact, I'm eating bread right now and getting peanut butter all over my keyboard. Alex is not amused. 

From the back of my coffee mug.

"Our task must be to free ourselves by widening the circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty."

- Albert Einstein

Some tidbits from a Conservative.

I found the following quotes quite interesting as they were spoken by Matthew Scully, a Conservative Republican, former senior speechwriter for George W. Bush, author of Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy, and contributor to the American Conservative:

"When a man's love of finery clouds his moral judgment, that is vanity. When he lets his demanding palate make his moral choices, that is gluttony. When he ascribes the divine will to his own whims, that is pride. And when he gets angry at being reminded of animal suffering that his own daily choices might help avoid, that is moral cowardice."

"The standard vegetarian argument that the average person eats meat, and yet could not bear to see how it was produced, actually speaks well for the average person. Imagine a world in which most people enjoyed hearing and seeing the details."

"The factory farm is an economic necessity, cuts costs for the consumer, unavoidable in the global economy, a fact of life, a way of life, a livelihood, blah, blah, blah, all this to justify an obvious moral evil so sick and horrendous it would leave us ashen, producing goods now replaceable, and employing people who could be making those alternative products instead. All this so we can have our accustomed veal or lamb or fried chicken or pork chop or hot dog at the ball park."

Giving equal consideration of interests to all beings capable of having interests is how one takes equality seriously. This isn't Leftist, Rightist, Conservative, Liberal, or radical; it's the absence of prejudice, it's mere logic, it's moral courage - these values are Universal.  

Insects count too.

I don't intentionally kill spiders, or bees, or ants, or any other insect that I find in my home. If I come upon an insect in my bedroom for example, I take the position of "live and let live." If I feel threatened, irrationally of course, I carefully remove the insect from my home and place him/her outside.

This must strike you as awfully strange. Why? Most of the evidence I have seen suggests that most insect species are not sentient; however, the jury is out as it were, and as I have observed crickets, for example, fleeing from painful stimuli it would appear that they have an interest in not being harmed. Although I don't know (the evidence would say that my intuition is wrong). But what if I am not and a fly is capable of subjectively experiencing the magazine crushing him; the crushing is the moment when the fly can no longer experience what gives him pleasure because he is dead, which is of course an important harm to consider in our moral decision-making.    

We don't know if 'Megan the spider' is sentient but in our observations we see actions to suggest that she is (e.g., she run's from an approaching foot), so what does it say about you that in the brief moment it would take to remove the spider from your bedroom and place her outside - and thus not unnecessarily murder her - you chose to crush her with a shoe and watch tv. 

There is power in fundamentally dominating a living creature, isn't there? That's a disturbing sickness not uncommon to our species.        

Let's play a little game.

One of the most interesting things I've discovered since going vegan is the extent to which animals are considered to be not living beings but property. It sounds weird at first because obviously your dog is a dog and not a chair, or a 1965 Ford Mustang, but in the eyes of the law and of most people animals are property. Think about it. We buy, sell and trade them, dispose of them at will. Not the kind of things you do with people. I hope. 

As much as I hate the idea, it's revolutionary and quite helpful in understanding why people think it's okay to exploit animals as resources. Resources are there to be used, after all. Property can't have rights or interests either. When you drive your car you don't think about whether or not the car wants to be driven. The car is there to be driven, unless it's a really cool car in which case it's there to enhance my awesomeness status to BEYOND AMAZING. 

Think I'm crazy? If you're like me, you don't want to think of animals as property. My horse is my friend, not a handbag, not even a really nice handbag. But the majority of people in this world? They think of animals as property, or as semi-property, occupying a category in between a living being and a piece of furniture. Even people who 'love' animals do. Still don't believe me? Let's play a little game with pop culture, shall we? 

Turn your TV on to Animal Planet. Watch one of those shows designed to make you simultaneously sob at how cruel humans can be to animals and revel in how wonderful we are for saving them. Detroit/Houston/Miami Animal Cops will work. Now count the number of times the animals are referred to as he, she or it. You only get to count the times where the officer or whoever is in charge of being benevolent knows the gender of the animal. 

And the 'its' have it. I rest my case.